This, however, can become possible in the measure where the text, in a determined perspective, is seen as linking element in a ritual that joins sender and receiver. However, this type of boarding is extremely expensive to the antropolgico look concerning the community of the men, therefore the myth is estruturante and founding element of the proper notion of sociability, related to this affirms Rossner (1989): The society of that as much is said is that one that perhaps does not read everything that would have, or accurately what it would have to read, but that without shade of doubts, it consumes more literature, in the ample direction of the term, that any one of its predecessors. (p 53 the 55) By means of the ideas of Rossner, one evidences that the rite of the reading becomes each accessible time only the initiates in an almost extinct knowledge. However, in a first relation between myth and the workmanship the Lusadas, is understood that the study of literary texts it can demonstrate that the same ones keep narrow relation with the universes of a profane speech that backwards elements of a cultuado speech. This approach, enters the universes of the sacred one and profane, in a consecrated text, it seems to satisfy us, for turn, extra-literary criteria intra and, that can both, to be sent symbolic dimension of the art in the life human being and to the ideological statute of the narrative, so that this invigorates more in brought up to date times. In short, the mitificado text creates its proper standards of production and consumption, creates sociocultural realities and resounds in spheres of pluri-societais meanings.