philosophy

Much even so the positive law is a right established in the alternating decisions of a legislator politician, it, the positive law, each time has covered little the necessities of the legitimation, appealing to the tradition or the eticidade, which forms in them throughout the life. 1998 are known that the classic natural law, since the Aristotelian tradition and of the Christian natural law, had entered per century XIX, in whose reflectia period if, in the HABERMAS optics, (: 160) one: ' ' Social Ethos Global' ' , that it penetrates through the distinct social layers of the population and ties to the diverse orders sociais.&#039 mutually; ' Not being, however, the rights of the man and the beginning of popular sovereignty, the only ideas to justify the modern right, will be glimpsed, certainly, others two dimensions that if become excellent in the process of constitution of a plural society that they have to see with: the self-determination; the autorealizao. With effect: it enters the Rights of the Man and the popular sovereignty, on the other hand; the two dimensions, for another one, cannot, surely, establish a linear correspondence. Between both the concepts give affinities that can be accented more or less with force. The traditions actuais politics in the United States, call them HABERMAS (1998: 164) of: ' ' liberal and republican and they understand on the other hand the rights of the man as expression of moral self-determination, on the other hand, the popular sovereignty as expression of the autorealizao tica' '. The system of rights constructed by Habermas and that it will lead, after all, to one better understanding, acceptance and fulfilment of the human rights, has to balance itself in the private autonomy and the public autonomy of the citizens, because according to thinking (1998: 184): ' ' Such system have-of containing, necessarily those rights that the citizens have-of granting themselves reciprocal and regulating its convivncia in legitimate terms with the ways right it positivo.' ' is interesting to verify the importance that the subjective or natural rights have in the modern legal systems.

We human beings are devoid of attention, that is certain. He has who disagrees, however I will cite a well accessible example so that he does not have none doubts the respect. All we, since whom we are born we have characteristics that in them they become sociable human beings. How could behind a native in Brazil of five hundred years, without never having seen a person who was not of its tribe or knew its customs, to receive as well as had been so received the Portuguese or any another foreigner? How these aboriginals could have notion of what she was to be presenteado? Exactly that he was something of insignificant financial value for the colonizadores, for the presenteados ones had the value of being something that belongs to another one and it are given to it. The simple act to give and to receive, to be gentile. Still today we can so observe in the majority of the people this notable act of socialization and humildade when we see these creatures to vote in a candidate for the simple reason to have that one politician touching in its hand and saying confortantes words of friendship, that exactly false in some cases. I do not know if he is praiseworthy or disastrous, but the human being is, yes, devoid of attention.

7 and for the same reason that these natural things as any part of our body could be imaginary, still has things simpler than also they exist, that is, all the true or imaginary things are formed by means of our thought. perhaps 8 Therefore let us not consider badly that all sciences that depend on the composed things and the comment of the substance could be uncertain doubtful and, while the mathematical for the fact to be simpler and general joined in the nature or not, contain something certain exempt of doubt, therefore when thinking about a number it always sleeping or will the same be waked up independent of the state of the observer. 9 In as in case that, Discardings conceive that it has much time in its spirit believes that it has a God onipotente in which it was created by it. However, problematiza: who can assure that this God did not project these ideas in the thought and finished learning to coexist them? Even though in the mathematical, I can be been deceptive in believing the ways and the results that are found, due to illusion implanted for this deceptive God. On the other hand, this probably does not happen of this God, therefore it is sovereign and good. Exactly that it rejected its goodness and to imagine that it would be always deceiving this he would be contradictory, would annul other things that it only possesss, then could not consider this true idea. 10 Exactly considering the position of the atheists in doubting more on the presence of a powerful God of what the other uncertain things. Assuming that the history of God either one fbula and my existence either conceived by perhaps, at least the idea to fail and to deceive themselves composes the idea of imperfection, therefore how much lesser to be able joined in my creator probably I will deceive myself always, that is, not yet meeting tests on the safe existence of something.

Each person is only determinative e. This personality can be changed, be transformed, in accordance with ours will, that is our rational component. We never can leave that the part irrational commands our life, our position and defines our personality ' ' ' ' The family is the most important institution that exists. It is a safe port and a place of return. We always need a return place.

Nobody can live without a religion. The time passes with no rewind and in its to walk makes to turn the wheel of the life. Our cycle in the land closes with our death, that is consequence of our birth and the only certainty ' ' ' ' In the vision macro, we are born clean, without knowledge, not to be those inherent ones to our animal life and that we only survive because we are ' ' cuidados' ' for our ancestral ones. We immediately start to learn in scale velocssima, vertiginous. First we incorporate the knowledge most complex, such with, to eat, to drink, to see and to enxergar, to hear, to feel, to walk, to speak and to think, becoming reflected acts. This learning continues for all our life, with change of speed and dependent, in part, of our will. In the sequence we place in practical and to finally, we obtain to join the knowledge with the practical one, incorporating the experience.

The set, the addition of these stages we call WISDOM. Therefore the wisdom comes to be something more necessarily pertinent to the aged ones. The wisdom makes with that let us analyze our knowledge and its applications, processing them and showing of ready the possible results. Each phase inside happens of its time and always in an only direction ' ' ' ' Some principles, some dictated, some thoughts that had come if consolidating through the times for the work of the great thinkers and the accumulated sabedorias, that are placed ahead, they are, we can say, concentrated pills, of which we can use in elapsing of our time ' ' ' ' First, which is proven that everything what we make has the direction and the direction of the happiness, is not perennial and yes moments.